← Back to Home
Filed under Nutrition

Raw Pet Food Diets: What the FDA and CDC Say About Pathogen Risks

Why the CDC and FDA discourage raw pet food: salmonella and listeria findings, zoonotic risks in the home, and safe handling guidance for raw feeders.

A person washing their hands at a kitchen sink next to a thawing package of raw frozen dog food resting on the counter.
Featured imageNutrition

Among the major public health agencies, raw pet food occupies an unusual place: it is the one diet category they actively discourage. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states plainly on its pet food safety pages that it does not recommend feeding raw pet food or treats to dogs and cats, and the Food and Drug Administration has spent years sampling, warning, and recalling raw products. The American Veterinary Medical Association likewise discourages the practice.

The reasoning is not a judgment about ancestral diets, nor a defense of kibble. It is about a basic fact of microbiology: raw animal protein has not been heated to the temperature that kills pathogens. The CDC notes that raw pet foods, whether sold fresh, frozen, freeze-dried, or dehydrated, typically contain uncooked muscle meat, organ meat, bones, eggs, or unpasteurized milk.

Techniques like high-pressure processing, which kill germs without heat, complicate the picture further. The CDC still classifies products treated this way as raw pet food, because there is not enough information about how well pet food processing facilities are using such methods in practice. [1]

Advocates of raw feeding often describe glossier coats, smaller stools, and better energy, and some owners genuinely report these changes. The agencies' position does not claim those reports are false. It simply weighs them against a documented infectious risk that the benefits, however real to the individual animal, do not cancel out.

What testing actually finds

FDA's 2010–2012 sampling found Salmonella in 15 of 196 raw pet food samples and Listeria monocytogenes in 32. This was a particular study of sampled products, not an estimate that every raw meal has those probabilities of contamination today. It demonstrates a hazard that needs to be considered alongside handling and the health of people and animals in the household. [2]

The FDA recall list provides product-specific examples of pathogen contamination. Check the exact food, size, lot and dates rather than assuming every product from a brand is affected. A recall is evidence about the named products; counting notices without accounting for sampling and sales volume would not establish which format has the highest population-wide failure rate.

It bears emphasis that detection does not require a sick animal. Healthy dogs and cats can eat contaminated raw food, show no symptoms at all, and still shed Salmonella in their stool and saliva, meaning the bowl on the floor, the crumbs dropped during preparation, and the enthusiastic face-lick afterward all become routes by which bacteria travel from the freezer to the family.

The risk extends past the dog bowl

This is where raw feeding stops being a private dietary choice and becomes a household health question. The people most vulnerable to foodborne illness, including infants and young children, adults over sixty-five, pregnant women, and anyone with a weakened immune system, are exactly the people who most often share a home with a dog or cat. The CDC's guidance is pointed on this front, urging particular caution in such households.

Infection in people can follow ordinary contact: handling the food itself, cleaning the bowl, or being licked by an animal that has just eaten. Salmonellosis typically brings diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps, while Listeria, though less common, is more dangerous, particularly during pregnancy. Neither requires the pet to be ill. An apparently healthy pet can still carry and shed pathogens.

Pets do get sick too. Salmonella in dogs and cats can cause vomiting, sometimes bloody diarrhea, fever, and lethargy, with puppies, seniors, and animals with existing conditions at greatest risk. If a raw-fed pet develops gastrointestinal illness, veterinary care is warranted, and the diet history matters for the vet's assessment.

Freeze-drying does not solve the problem, a nuance that trips up many buyers. The process removes moisture but is not a guaranteed kill step for bacteria, which is why the CDC counts freeze-dried and dehydrated raw products among raw pet foods. Irradiation and similar treatments appear on some labels, yet the agency's classification does not change.

If you feed raw anyway

Some owners will read all of this and continue raw feeding, whether for philosophical reasons, perceived benefits, or a veterinarian-supervised plan. Public health agencies acknowledge that choice and offer harm-reduction guidance rather than pretending that prohibition is enforceable. The hygiene rules are consistent across CDC and FDA materials, and they are worth following to the letter.

  • Wash your hands with soap and water for at least twenty seconds after handling raw pet food, and supervise children so they do the same.
  • Keep raw pet food frozen until use and thaw it in the refrigerator, sealed and kept separate from human food.
  • Clean and disinfect all surfaces, bowls, scoops, and utensils that touch the product, and wash pet bowls frequently.
  • Do not let your pet lick your face or mouth, especially after eating, and never allow contact with open wounds or broken skin.

Nutritional completeness is the other caution. Homemade raw rations, in particular, have repeatedly been found in published analyses to fall short on minerals such as calcium and on several vitamins, sometimes severely enough to cause bone disease in growing dogs. Commercial raw products should carry a nutritional adequacy statement, and any home-prepared diet should be designed or reviewed by a board-certified veterinary nutritionist.

The agencies' message, distilled, is not that every raw-fed animal will become ill, without claiming that every exposed animal will, but that raw feeding measurably raises the odds of pathogen exposure for the pet and everyone around it, and that those odds are avoidable. If your household includes young children, elderly relatives, or immunocompromised members, most veterinarians and the CDC would steer you firmly toward a cooked diet.

For everyone else, the decision deserves an honest conversation with a veterinarian who knows your animal, your kitchen, and your risk tolerance. Whatever you choose, the hygiene rules above cost little, and nutritional completeness should be verified rather than assumed.

Sources and further reading

Editorially reviewed on . Sources support the topics noted below; this is not a veterinary review or individual medical advice.

  1. CDC: About pet food safety — Raw-food definitions, household risks and handling.
  2. FDA: Raw pet food diets can be dangerous — Specific Salmonella/Listeria sampling results and study limitations.
← Previous articleDental Disease in Cats: Signs and Professional Care

More in Nutrition

All Nutrition →